Colorants Alimentaires vs Colorante alimentario
Overall, Colorants Alimentaires has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colorants Alimentaires | Colorante alimentario |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 262 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 48 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 35 g |
| Fiber | — | 7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 7 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colorants Alimentaires has 26% fewer calories (262 kcal vs 353 kcal).
- Colorants Alimentaires has no fat, while Colorante alimentario has 2.2 g.
- Colorante alimentario has 99% less sugar (0.7 g vs 48 g).
- Colorants Alimentaires has 98% less salt (0.6 g vs 35 g).
- Colorante alimentario has 100% more protein (5.8 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Colorants Alimentaires
Sirop de glucose, sucre, eau, colorants (rose: rouge allura AC*, violet: azorubine*, bleu brillant FCF, jaune : tartrazine, vert : tartrazine), gélifiant: agar-agar, acidifiant: acide citrique, conservateur: sorbate de potassium.
Colorante alimentario
Harina de maiz sal, colorantes (tartracina (E102), amarillo anaranjado S (E110)).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colorants Alimentaires or Colorante alimentario?
Overall, Colorants Alimentaires has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colorants Alimentaires has fewer calories: 262 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colorante alimentario has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 48 g per 100 g.