Comparison

Colorant alimentaire vs Colorante alimentario

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColorant alimentaireColorante alimentario
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 264 kcal 353 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 2.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 46 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 35 g
Fiber 0 g 7 g
Protein 0.4 g 5.8 g
Additives102
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colorant alimentaire has 25% fewer calories (264 kcal vs 353 kcal).
  • Colorant alimentaire has 91% less fat (0.2 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Colorante alimentario has 98% less sugar (0.7 g vs 46 g).
  • Colorant alimentaire has 100% less salt (0.1 g vs 35 g).
  • Colorante alimentario has 100% more fiber (7 g vs 0 g).
  • Colorante alimentario has 93% more protein (5.8 g vs 0.4 g).

Ingredients

Colorant alimentaire

Sirop de glucose, sucre, eau, ingrédients colorants (concentrés de carthame et de citron), colorants (lutéine, carmins, curcumine, bleu brillant FCF), gélifiant (carraghénanes), correcteurs d'acidité (acide citrique, acide lactique, acide acétique, lactate de sodium), conservateur (sorbate de potassium).

Colorante alimentario

Harina de maiz sal, colorantes (tartracina (E102), amarillo anaranjado S (E110)).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colorant alimentaire or Colorante alimentario?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colorant alimentaire has fewer calories: 264 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colorante alimentario has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 46 g per 100 g.

More comparisons