Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise vs Bordelaise
Overall, Bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d'Alaska à la bordelai... | Bordelaise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 147 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 8.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 4.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 13.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has 64% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 4.7 g).
- Bordelaise has no sugar, while Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has 0.6 g.
- Bordelaise has 63% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Bordelaise lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise
Not available.
Bordelaise
Alaska-Seelachs Filet 75% [Theragra chalcogramma] (Wildfang, Nordostpazifik), Wasser, Butter, Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Petersilie, Zwiebeln getrocknet, Kochsalz, Hefe, Säuerungsmittel (Citronensäure), Knoblauchpulver, Gewürzextrakte.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise or Bordelaise?
Overall, Bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 150 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bordelaise has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.