Coles de Bruselas vs Rosenkohl lila
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coles de Bruselas | Rosenkohl lila |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 43 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coles de Bruselas has 13% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Rosenkohl lila has 24% less sugar (2.2 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Coles de Bruselas
Coles de Bruselas
Rosenkohl lila
Rosenkohl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coles de Bruselas or Rosenkohl lila?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coles de Bruselas has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rosenkohl lila has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.