Comparison
Coca cola zero vs Tymbark
Overall, Coca cola zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coca cola zero | Tymbark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | — |
| Fiber | — | 4.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coca cola zero has 99% fewer calories (0 kcal vs 20 kcal).
- Coca cola zero has no fat, while Tymbark has 0.5 g.
- Coca cola zero has no sugar, while Tymbark has 4.9 g.
- Tymbark has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Coca cola zero
Not available.
Tymbark
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coca cola zero or Tymbark?
Overall, Coca cola zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coca cola zero has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coca cola zero has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.