Comparison
Latte merenda della Lola vs Tymbark
Overall, Tymbark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Latte merenda della Lola | Tymbark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 4.9 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tymbark has 76% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 84 kcal).
- Tymbark has 71% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Tymbark has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Tymbark has 62% less sugar (4.9 g vs 13 g).
- Tymbark has 78% more fiber (4.9 g vs 1.1 g).
- Latte merenda della Lola has 86% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Latte merenda della Lola
Not available.
Tymbark
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Latte merenda della Lola or Tymbark?
Overall, Tymbark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tymbark has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 84 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tymbark has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 13 g per 100 g.