Comparison
H2O infusion vs Tymbark
Overall, H2O infusion has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | H2O infusion | Tymbark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 245 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.8 g | 4.9 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 4.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tymbark has 92% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 245 kcal).
- H2O infusion has no fat, while Tymbark has 0.5 g.
- H2O infusion has 22% less sugar (3.8 g vs 4.9 g).
- H2O infusion has 25% more fiber (6.5 g vs 4.9 g).
- Tymbark has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
H2O infusion
Not available.
Tymbark
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: H2O infusion or Tymbark?
Overall, H2O infusion has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tymbark has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
H2O infusion has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.