Tymbark vs BCCA Restore
Overall, Tymbark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Tymbark | BCCA Restore |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 34 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 7.1 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tymbark has 41% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 34 kcal).
- BCCA Restore has no fat, while Tymbark has 0.5 g.
- Tymbark has 31% less sugar (4.9 g vs 7.1 g).
- Tymbark has 100% more fiber (4.9 g vs 0 g).
- BCCA Restore has 55% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Tymbark
Not available.
BCCA Restore
Succhi di frutta da concentrati 79% (mela, Limone amminoacidi 1,6% (1-leucina, l-valina, l-isoleucina), carbonato d riduzione della stanchezza e dell'affaticamento. Il magnesio cont aroma naturale. La vitamina C contribuisce al normale metabolism della stanchezza e dell'affaticamento e alla normale funzione deve essere assunto come parte di una dieta varia ed equilibrata sano. Quantità suggerita: 1 lattina (250 ml) nell'arco della giornata contiene 4.000 mg di BCAA 2:1:1 (L-leucina, L-va PRODOTTO VEGANO. Conservare in luogo fresco e asciutto. Agitare
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tymbark or BCCA Restore?
Overall, Tymbark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tymbark has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 34 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tymbark has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.