Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf vs Buche surprise
Overall, Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Classic Sourdough Sliced Loa... | Buche surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 246 kcal | 241 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 12.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf has 86% less fat (1.8 g vs 12.9 g).
- Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf has no saturated fat, while Buche surprise has 5.3 g.
- Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf has no sugar, while Buche surprise has 4.6 g.
- Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf has 17% more fiber (3.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf
ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR, WATER, RYE FLOUR, WHOLE GRAIN RYE FLOUR, SALT, CULTURED WHEAT FLOUR, YEAST, WHEAT GLUTEN, LACTIC ACID, MALTED BARLEY FLOUR, ENZYMES, ASCORBIC ACID.
Buche surprise
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf or Buche surprise?
Overall, Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Buche surprise has fewer calories: 241 kcal versus 246 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Classic Sourdough Sliced Loaf has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.