Cioccolata vs Protochoc bar
Overall, Protochoc bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cioccolata | Protochoc bar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 541 kcal | 448 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.1 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 52 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 35 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Protochoc bar has 17% fewer calories (448 kcal vs 541 kcal).
- Cioccolata has 61% less saturated fat (7.1 g vs 18 g).
- Protochoc bar has 99% less sugar (0.7 g vs 52 g).
- Protochoc bar has 80% more protein (35 g vs 7 g).
- Protochoc bar has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cioccolata
Not available.
Protochoc bar
Quant per Quant. per 190g 35g ESFR NL MITTLERE NÄHRWERT/AVERAGE NUTRITIONAL VALUES PER/VALORES NUTRICIONALES MEDIOS PARA/VALERS JUTRITION MOYENNES POUR/
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cioccolata or Protochoc bar?
Overall, Protochoc bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Protochoc bar has fewer calories: 448 kcal versus 541 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Protochoc bar has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 52 g per 100 g.