Comparison

Bianco nocciole cereali vs Protochoc bar

Overall, Protochoc bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBianco nocciole cerealiProtochoc bar
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 564 kcal 448 kcal
Fat 35.9 g 31 g
Saturated fat 18.1 g 18 g
Sugars 47.1 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.5 g
Fiber 1 g —
Protein 7.9 g 35 g
Additives00
AllergensMilk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Protochoc bar has 21% fewer calories (448 kcal vs 564 kcal).
  • Protochoc bar has 14% less fat (31 g vs 35.9 g).
  • Protochoc bar has 99% less sugar (0.7 g vs 47.1 g).
  • Protochoc bar has 77% more protein (35 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Protochoc bar has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Bianco nocciole cereali lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Bianco nocciole cereali

Not available.

Protochoc bar

Quant per Quant. per 190g 35g ESFR NL MITTLERE NÄHRWERT/AVERAGE NUTRITIONAL VALUES PER/VALORES NUTRICIONALES MEDIOS PARA/VALERS JUTRITION MOYENNES POUR/

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bianco nocciole cereali or Protochoc bar?

Overall, Protochoc bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Protochoc bar has fewer calories: 448 kcal versus 564 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Protochoc bar has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 47.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons