Comparison

Chunky Salsa vs Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChunky SalsaSun-Ripened Cherry Tomato &...
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 30 kcal 17 kcal
Fat 0 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 3 g 4.3 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.7 g
Fiber 3 g 1.3 g
Protein 0 g 1.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNoneNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil has 43% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 30 kcal).
  • Chunky Salsa has no fat, while Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil has 2.1 g.
  • Chunky Salsa has no saturated fat, while Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil has 0.3 g.
  • Chunky Salsa has 30% less sugar (3 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil has 40% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Chunky Salsa has 58% more fiber (3 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil has 100% more protein (1.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chunky Salsa lists: None.

Ingredients

Chunky Salsa

TOMATO PUREE (WATER, TOMATO PASTE), DICED TOMATOES, TOMATO JUICE, ONIONS, JALAPEÑO PEPPERS, 2% VINEGAR, SALT, POTASSIUM SALT, NATURAL FLAVORS, GARLIC POWDER.

Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil

Tomato (75%), tomato puree, sundried cherry tomato (6%), onion, extra virgin olive oil, basil (2%), garlic, sea salt, apple juice concentrate, lemon juice concentrate, black pepper.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chunky Salsa or Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sun-Ripened Cherry Tomato & Basil has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chunky Salsa has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons