Comparison

Choucroute william saurin vs Choucroute au naturel

Overall, Choucroute au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChoucroute william saurinChoucroute au naturel
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 47 kcal 21 kcal
Fat 4 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 0 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.4 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.2 g
Fiber 4.3 g 2.1 g
Protein 0.5 g 1.4 g
Additives00
AllergensCelery, Eggs, Gluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Choucroute au naturel has 55% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 47 kcal).
  • Choucroute au naturel has no fat, while Choucroute william saurin has 4 g.
  • Choucroute au naturel has no saturated fat, while Choucroute william saurin has 1.6 g.
  • Choucroute william saurin has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Choucroute william saurin has 51% more fiber (4.3 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Choucroute au naturel has 64% more protein (1.4 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Choucroute au naturel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Choucroute william saurin lists: Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Choucroute william saurin

Choucroute précuite (69 %), eau, saindoux, sel, Riesling 0,8 % (contient lait et œuf), arômes (dont blé et céleri), baies de genièvre, graines de cumin, Contient : _blé_, _lait_, _œuf_, _céleri_,

Choucroute au naturel

Chou* blanc, sel marin. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique ABCDE NUTRI-SCORE

FAQ

Which is healthier: Choucroute william saurin or Choucroute au naturel?

Overall, Choucroute au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Choucroute au naturel has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Choucroute william saurin has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons