Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform vs Rotkohl mit Apfelstücken
Overall, Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform
Rotkohl mit Apfelstücken
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BI... | Rotkohl mit Apfelstücken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 17 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 8.9 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform has 64% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform has 96% less sugar (0.4 g vs 8.9 g).
- Rotkohl mit Apfelstücken has 64% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform has 52% more fiber (3.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform
Chou rouge lactofermenté (chou rouge, sel marin). Jus : eau, sel marin, antioxydant : acide ascorbique 0,03%.
Rotkohl mit Apfelstücken
Chou rouge (66%), eau, sucre, morceaux de pomme (6,8%), vinaigre naturel, amidon de maïs, sel de mer.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform or Rotkohl mit Apfelstücken?
Overall, Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chou rouge lacto-fermenté BIO Nutriform has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 8.9 g per 100 g.