Choped tipo lata cuadrado vs Zumo+Leche Caribe
Overall, Zumo+Leche Caribe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choped tipo lata cuadrado | Zumo+Leche Caribe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 11.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 6.8 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zumo+Leche Caribe has 82% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 172 kcal).
- Zumo+Leche Caribe has no fat, while Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 11.5 g.
- Zumo+Leche Caribe has no saturated fat, while Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 4 g.
- Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 93% less sugar (0.5 g vs 6.8 g).
- Zumo+Leche Caribe has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.2 g).
- Choped tipo lata cuadrado has 97% more protein (13 g vs 0.4 g).
- Zumo+Leche Caribe has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Choped tipo lata cuadrado
Not available.
Zumo+Leche Caribe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choped tipo lata cuadrado or Zumo+Leche Caribe?
Overall, Zumo+Leche Caribe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zumo+Leche Caribe has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Choped tipo lata cuadrado has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.