Comparison

Chocolat chaud vs Nesquik

Overall, Chocolat chaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat chaudNesquik
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 103 kcal 386 kcal
Fat 2.2 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1.6 g
Sugars 13.7 g 75.1 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.4 g
Fiber 0.7 g 7.7 g
Protein 3.5 g 5.1 g
Additives20
AllergensGluten, MilkSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat chaud has 73% fewer calories (103 kcal vs 386 kcal).
  • Chocolat chaud has 38% less fat (2.2 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Chocolat chaud has 76% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Chocolat chaud has 82% less sugar (13.7 g vs 75.1 g).
  • Nesquik has 91% more fiber (7.7 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Nesquik has 31% more protein (5.1 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Only Chocolat chaud lists: Gluten, Milk.
  • Only Nesquik lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chocolat chaud

Sucre, additif alimentaire (phosphate de diamidon hydroxypropylé SIN 1442 (épaississant]: selon BPF), cacao en poudre, chocolat en poudre 5% (sucre, pâte de cacao, cacao maigre en poudre, arôme vanille (naturel), additif alimentaire (carboxyméthyl-cellulose sodique SIN 466 [stabilisant]: Selon BPF), sel, arôme vanilline (artificiel). contient du lait. Le produit est fabriqué dans un atelier contenant du gluten.

Nesquik

Açúcar, cacau magro em pó (23%), emulsionante (lecitina de _soja_), sal, vitaminas (C, D), aroma natural e canela.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat chaud or Nesquik?

Overall, Chocolat chaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat chaud has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat chaud has less sugar: 13.7 g versus 75.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons