Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes vs Kit Kat x10
Overall, Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat au lait avec gaufre... | Kit Kat x10 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 536 kcal | 510 kcal |
| Fat | 29.6 g | 26.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.8 g | 14.7 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 43.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kit Kat x10 has 12% less fat (26.1 g vs 29.6 g).
- Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes has 85% less sugar (6.4 g vs 43.4 g).
- Kit Kat x10 has 23% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes
sucre, farine de blé, lait en poudre, beurre de cacao, masse de cacao, huile de soja hydrogénée, émulsifiant - lécithine de soja (E322), agent de levée, bicarbonate de sodium (E500), sel, arôme identique nature (vanilline), cacao dans le chocolat (25%)
Kit Kat x10
sugar, wheat flour , skimmed milk powder, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, vegetable fats (palm, shea), butterfat ( milk ), fat reduced cocoa powder, emulsifier (lecithins), raising agent (sodium carbonates)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes or Kit Kat x10?
Overall, Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kit Kat x10 has fewer calories: 510 kcal versus 536 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat au lait avec gaufrettes has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 43.4 g per 100 g.