Comparison

Chips de pois chiche vs Hummus bites tomato and basil

Overall, Hummus bites tomato and basil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips de pois chicheHummus bites tomato and basi...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 496 kcal 453 kcal
Fat 26.3 g 16 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 1.1 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.4 g
Salt 2 g 1 g
Fiber 6.8 g 3.7 g
Protein 9 g 9.1 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hummus bites tomato and basil has 39% less fat (16 g vs 26.3 g).
  • Hummus bites tomato and basil has 56% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Hummus bites tomato and basil has 48% less salt (1 g vs 2 g).
  • Chips de pois chiche has 46% more fiber (6.8 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Hummus bites tomato and basil has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chips de pois chiche is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Chips de pois chiche

Farine de pois chiche, fécule de pommes de terre, farine de pommes de terre, huile de tournesol non hydrogénée, sel.

Hummus bites tomato and basil

31% Chickpea Flour, Potato Starch, Rice Flour, Rapeseed Oil, Cornflour, Tomato and Basil Seasoning (Rice Flour, Dextrose, Sugar, Tomato Powder, Yeast Extract Powder, Onion Powder, Salt, Herbs (Basil, Parsley), Garlic Powder, Acid: Citric Acid: Flavouring, Cayenne Pepper, Colour: Paprika Extract), Salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips de pois chiche or Hummus bites tomato and basil?

Overall, Hummus bites tomato and basil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hummus bites tomato and basil has fewer calories: 453 kcal versus 496 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips de pois chiche has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons