Chips à l’ancienne vs Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika
Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chips à l’ancienne
Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips à l’ancienne | Gut und Günstig Riffelchips... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 543 kcal | 540 kcal |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 15.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 4 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips à l’ancienne has 81% less saturated fat (3 g vs 15.6 g).
- Chips à l’ancienne has 88% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Chips à l’ancienne has 64% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika has 85% more protein (6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Chips à l’ancienne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chips à l’ancienne
Not available.
Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika
59% Kartoffeln, Palmöl, _Weizenmehl_, Speisesalz, Zucker, Paprikapulver, Gewürze, Hefepulver, natürliches Aroma, Hefeextrakt, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Rauch,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips à l’ancienne or Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika?
Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika has fewer calories: 540 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips à l’ancienne has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.