Chips à l'ancienne vs Chips à l’ancienne
Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chips à l'ancienne
Chips à l’ancienne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips à l'ancienne | Chips à l’ancienne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 553 kcal | 543 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 33.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 4.9 g | — |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips à l’ancienne has 10% less fat (33.3 g vs 37 g).
- Chips à l’ancienne has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Chips à l’ancienne has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Chips à l'ancienne has 84% more protein (5.5 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Chips à l'ancienne
Pommes de terre (origine France) 62,1%, huile de tournesol 37%, sel. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, lait, moutarde et céleri.
Chips à l’ancienne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips à l'ancienne or Chips à l’ancienne?
Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips à l’ancienne has fewer calories: 543 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips à l’ancienne has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.