Chili (Zerdrückt) vs Chilipoeder
Overall, Chilipoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chili (Zerdrückt) | Chilipoeder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 316 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 13.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.2 g | 7.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 15.6 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chilipoeder has 79% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 316 kcal).
- Chilipoeder has 96% less fat (0.5 g vs 13.6 g).
- Chilipoeder has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.4 g).
- Chili (Zerdrückt) has 22% less sugar (6.2 g vs 7.9 g).
- Chilipoeder has 33% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Chili (Zerdrückt) has 82% more protein (15.6 g vs 2.8 g).
Ingredients
Chili (Zerdrückt)
Piment
Chilipoeder
chilipoeder
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chili (Zerdrückt) or Chilipoeder?
Overall, Chilipoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chilipoeder has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 316 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chili (Zerdrückt) has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.