Comparison

Chili (Zerdrückt) vs Chilipoeder

Overall, Chilipoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChili (Zerdrückt)Chilipoeder
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 316 kcal 66 kcal
Fat 13.6 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 6.2 g 7.9 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.7 g 2.5 g
Protein 15.6 g 2.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chilipoeder has 79% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 316 kcal).
  • Chilipoeder has 96% less fat (0.5 g vs 13.6 g).
  • Chilipoeder has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Chili (Zerdrückt) has 22% less sugar (6.2 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Chilipoeder has 33% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Chili (Zerdrückt) has 82% more protein (15.6 g vs 2.8 g).

Ingredients

Chili (Zerdrückt)

Piment

Chilipoeder

chilipoeder

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chili (Zerdrückt) or Chilipoeder?

Overall, Chilipoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chilipoeder has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 316 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chili (Zerdrückt) has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons