Red pepper powder (coarse) vs Chilipoeder
Overall, Chilipoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red pepper powder (coarse) | Chilipoeder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 330 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 7.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chilipoeder has 80% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 330 kcal).
- Chilipoeder has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 10 g).
- Red pepper powder (coarse) has no sugar, while Chilipoeder has 7.9 g.
- Chilipoeder has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Red pepper powder (coarse) has 86% more protein (20 g vs 2.8 g).
Ingredients
Red pepper powder (coarse)
Chili
Chilipoeder
chilipoeder
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red pepper powder (coarse) or Chilipoeder?
Overall, Chilipoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chilipoeder has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red pepper powder (coarse) has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.