Comparison
Chili Pepper vs Chilipoeder
Overall, Chilipoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chili Pepper | Chilipoeder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 450 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 7.9 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 30 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chilipoeder has 85% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 450 kcal).
- Chilipoeder has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 25 g).
- Chili Pepper has no sugar, while Chilipoeder has 7.9 g.
- Chilipoeder has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Chili Pepper has 92% more fiber (30 g vs 2.5 g).
- Chili Pepper has 86% more protein (20 g vs 2.8 g).
- Chilipoeder is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chili Pepper lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Chili Pepper
Chili, sesame seeds, maltodextrine, rapeseed oil, cumin, Sichuan pepper, fennel, salt, spices, flavors
Chilipoeder
chilipoeder
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chili Pepper or Chilipoeder?
Overall, Chilipoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chilipoeder has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 450 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chili Pepper has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.