Chicken Tenders vs Chicken Katsu Bites
Overall, Chicken Tenders has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chicken Tenders | Chicken Katsu Bites |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 221 kcal | 284 kcal |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 16.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 13.7 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chicken Tenders has 22% fewer calories (221 kcal vs 284 kcal).
- Chicken Tenders has 37% less fat (10.5 g vs 16.7 g).
- Chicken Tenders has 53% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Chicken Katsu Bites has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Chicken Katsu Bites has 32% more protein (20 g vs 13.7 g).
Ingredients
Chicken Tenders
organic boneless chicken breast with rib meat, water, organic rice flour, organic yellow corn flour, organic yellow corn meal, contains less than 2% of sea salt, organic corn starch, organic garlic powder, organic cane sugar, organic onion powder, raisin juice concentrate, organic honey, organic white pepper, organic black pepper, organic yeast extract,
Chicken Katsu Bites
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chicken Tenders or Chicken Katsu Bites?
Overall, Chicken Tenders has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chicken Tenders has fewer calories: 221 kcal versus 284 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chicken Tenders has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.