Comparison

Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano vs Salade Snacking Bol Caesar 250g MIX

Overall, Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChicken Caesar Salad with Ca...Salade Snacking Bol Caesar 2...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 136 kcal 162 kcal
Fat 7.2 g 8.2 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 1.6 g
Sugars 1.4 g 1.3 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber 1.1 g 1.6 g
Protein 10.7 g 7.5 g
Additives05
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, MustardEggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano has 16% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 162 kcal).
  • Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano has 12% less fat (7.2 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano has no salt, while Salade Snacking Bol Caesar 250g MIX has 0.5 g.
  • Salade Snacking Bol Caesar 250g MIX has 31% more fiber (1.6 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano has 30% more protein (10.7 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano

Lettuce, Cooked Sliced Chicken (28%) (Chicken Breast, Salt, Cornflour), Caesar Dressing (13%) (Water, Rapeseed Oil, Medium Fat Hard Cheese (Cows' Milk), Cornflour, Pasteurised Egg Yolk, Chives, Spirit Vinegar, Lemon Juice, Sugar, Salt, Black Pepper, White Wine Vinegar, Garlic Purée, Mustard Seed), Croutons (6%) (Fortified Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Olive Oil, Salt, Sea Salt, Yeast, Wheat Flour, Sunflower Oil, Enzymes), Parmigiano Reggiano Cheese (5%) (Cows' Milk).

Salade Snacking Bol Caesar 250g MIX

108,5 g de Penne cuisinées (43,4%) : pâtes alimentaires penne cuites 39% (eau, semoule de blé dur de qualité supérieure), tomates mi-séchées 1,6%, plantes aromatiques 1,3%, huile de colza, jus de tomates concentré, sucre, huile de tournesol, sel. 67,5 g d'Ingrédients Savoureux (27%) : émincés de filet de poulet traité en salaison rôti 10% (filet de poulet 9,8% (origine : hors UE), amidons, dextrose, sel), œufs durs 9%, tomates cerise 6%, fromage à pâte pressée cuite 2% (origine : Italie). 40 g de Salades mélangées (16%) : laitue, chicorée et roquette. 30 g de Sauce condimentaire au Parmigiano Reggiano (12%) : eau, huile de colza, huile d'olive vierge extra, Parmigiano Reggiano 1,2%, moutarde de Dijon (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, antioxydant : disulfite de potassium, acidifiant : acide citrique), câpres (câpres, eau, vinaigre d'alcool, sel), poudre de fromage, sel, jus de citron concentré, ail, jaune d'œuf en poudre, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, persil, acidifiant : acide lactique, piment, conservateur : sorbate de potassium. 4 g de Crumble Salé (1,6%) : farine de blé, huile de tournesol haut oléique, sel 0,02%, levure.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano or Salade Snacking Bol Caesar 250g MIX?

Overall, Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chicken Caesar Salad with Caesar dressing, croutons and Parmigiano Reggiano has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 162 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade Snacking Bol Caesar 250g MIX has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons