Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr vs Smoky venison burger
Overall, Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chevreuil grand veneur 200 g... | Smoky venison burger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 117 kcal | 214 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 12.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 19.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr has 45% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 214 kcal).
- Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr has 75% less fat (3.1 g vs 12.5 g).
- Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr has 69% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 5.9 g).
- Smoky venison burger has 84% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Smoky venison burger has 39% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Smoky venison burger has 43% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Smoky venison burger has 17% more protein (19.3 g vs 16 g).
- Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr
Not available.
Smoky venison burger
VENISON (70%), BEEF FAT (19% Water, Pea Flour, Sea Salt, Cracked Black Pepper, Rice Flour, Onion Powder, Yeast Extract, Smoke Flavouring, Preservative: Sodium Metabisulphite, Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr or Smoky venison burger?
Overall, Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chevreuil grand veneur 200 gr has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smoky venison burger has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.