Champignons 3.Wahl vs Champignons coupés
Overall, Champignons 3.Wahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champignons 3.Wahl | Champignons coupés |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champignons 3.Wahl has 36% more fiber (2.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Champignons 3.Wahl has 14% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Champignons 3.Wahl
Champignons, Wasser, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure.
Champignons coupés
Champignons, eau, sel, acide citrique, acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champignons 3.Wahl or Champignons coupés?
Overall, Champignons 3.Wahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champignons 3.Wahl has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champignons coupés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.