Champignons 3.Wahl vs Champion de Paris
Overall, Champignons 3.Wahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Champignons 3.Wahl
Champion de Paris
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champignons 3.Wahl | Champion de Paris |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champignons 3.Wahl has 75% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Champignons 3.Wahl has 68% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0.9 g).
- Champignons 3.Wahl has 19% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Champignons 3.Wahl
Champignons, Wasser, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure.
Champion de Paris
Champignons de Paris (52,5%), eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique (E330), antioxidant: acide ascorbique (E300). (E300) Peut contenir des traces de sulfites.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champignons 3.Wahl or Champion de Paris?
Overall, Champignons 3.Wahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champignons 3.Wahl has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champignons 3.Wahl has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.