Champignons 3.Wahl vs Champignons de Paris pieds et morceaux
Overall, Champignons 3.Wahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Champignons 3.Wahl
Champignons de Paris pieds et morceaux
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champignons 3.Wahl | Champignons de Paris pieds e... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champignons 3.Wahl has 25% more fiber (2.8 g vs 2.1 g).
Ingredients
Champignons 3.Wahl
Champignons, Wasser, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure.
Champignons de Paris pieds et morceaux
Champignons de Paris, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champignons 3.Wahl or Champignons de Paris pieds et morceaux?
Overall, Champignons 3.Wahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champignons de Paris pieds et morceaux has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champignons 3.Wahl has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.