Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic vs Chair de tomates
Overall, Chair de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomates cuisinée ba... | Chair de tomates |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 47 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chair de tomates has 26% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Chair de tomates has 69% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Chair de tomates has 39% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic has 23% more fiber (2.6 g vs 2 g).
- Chair de tomates is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic
Pulpe de tomates 83 %, purée de tomates triple concentrée 8 %, oignon 4 %, huile de tournesol, sel, amidon modifié de maïs, sucre, plantes aromatiques (dont basilic déshydraté 0,16 %), poivre, arôme naturel de basilic, acidifiant: acide citrique. Traces de gluten, lait, céleri et moutarde.
Chair de tomates
Pulpe et purée de tomates* 99,4 %, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic or Chair de tomates?
Overall, Chair de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chair de tomates has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.