Comparison

Chair de tomate bio 400g vs Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic

Overall, Chair de tomate bio 400g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChair de tomate bio 400gChair de tomates cuisinée ba...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 33 kcal 47 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 4.8 g 4.2 g
Salt 0.5 g 1 g
Fiber 2.5 g 2.6 g
Protein 1.5 g 1.3 g
Additives02
AllergensCelery, Gluten, Milk, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chair de tomate bio 400g has 30% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 47 kcal).
  • Chair de tomate bio 400g has 81% less fat (0.3 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic has 12% less sugar (4.2 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Chair de tomate bio 400g has 49% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Chair de tomate bio 400g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chair de tomate bio 400g lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Chair de tomate bio 400g

Pulpe de tomates* 99.4%, sel marin. *issues de l'agriculture biologique.

Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic

Pulpe de tomates 83 %, purée de tomates triple concentrée 8 %, oignon 4 %, huile de tournesol, sel, amidon modifié de maïs, sucre, plantes aromatiques (dont basilic déshydraté 0,16 %), poivre, arôme naturel de basilic, acidifiant: acide citrique. Traces de gluten, lait, céleri et moutarde.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chair de tomate bio 400g or Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic?

Overall, Chair de tomate bio 400g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chair de tomate bio 400g has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons