Chair de tomates vs Chair de tomates
Overall, Chair de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomates | Chair de tomates |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 35 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chair de tomates has 20% more fiber (2.5 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Chair de tomates
Pulpe et purée de tomates* 99,4 %, sel.
Chair de tomates
Pulpe de tomates* 99.4 % (tomate origine France), sel marin * biologique. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, céleri, lait, moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomates or Chair de tomates?
Overall, Chair de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chair de tomates has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 35 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chair de tomates has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.