Comparison

Chair de tomates vs Chair de Tomates au Basilic

Overall, Chair de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChair de tomatesChair de Tomates au Basilic
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 33 kcal 47 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 4.8 g 4 g
Salt 0.5 g 1 g
Fiber 2.5 g 2.5 g
Protein 1.5 g 1.3 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chair de tomates has 30% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 47 kcal).
  • Chair de tomates has 83% less fat (0.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Chair de tomates has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Chair de Tomates au Basilic has 17% less sugar (4 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Chair de tomates has 49% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Chair de tomates is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chair de Tomates au Basilic lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Chair de tomates

Pulpe et purée de tomates* 99.4 % (tomate origine France), sel marin * biologique. Traces éventuelles de céleri, lait et moutarde.

Chair de Tomates au Basilic

Pulpe de tomates* 91% (tomate origine France), oignons*, huile de tournesol*, sel marin, sucre de canne*, épices* et plantes aromatiques* 0,3% (dont basilic* 0,18%), amidon de pomme de terre*, arôme naturel de basilic 0,03%, acidifiant : acide citrique. * biologique Traces éventuelles de céleri, lait, moutarde.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chair de tomates or Chair de Tomates au Basilic?

Overall, Chair de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chair de tomates has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chair de Tomates au Basilic has less sugar: 4 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons