Chair de tomate vs Chair de tomates
Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomate | Chair de tomates |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 27 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chair de tomate has 18% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 33 kcal).
- Chair de tomate has no fat, while Chair de tomates has 0.3 g.
- Chair de tomate has 15% less sugar (4.1 g vs 4.8 g).
- Chair de tomates has 28% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Chair de tomates has 40% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Chair de tomate
Tomates 70%, purée de tomates 29,2%, sucre, sel, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique.
Chair de tomates
Pulpe de tomates* 99.4 % (tomate origine France), sel marin * biologique. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, céleri, lait, moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomate or Chair de tomates?
Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chair de tomate has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chair de tomate has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.