Chair de tomate vs Chair de tomates
Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomate | Chair de tomates |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chair de tomate has 31% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 35 kcal).
- Chair de tomate has 41% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4.4 g).
- Chair de tomate has 20% more fiber (2.5 g vs 2 g).
- Only Chair de tomate lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Chair de tomate
Pulpe de tomates* (Origine France) 99,4%, sel marin non raffine. *Issu de l'Agriculture Biologique. Peut contenir des traces de lait, moutarde et céleri
Chair de tomates
Pulpe et purée de tomates* 99,4 %, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomate or Chair de tomates?
Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chair de tomate has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 35 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chair de tomate has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.