Chair de tomates vs Pulpe de tomate
Overall, Pulpe de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomates | Pulpe de tomate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pulpe de tomate has 24% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 33 kcal).
- Pulpe de tomate has 35% less sugar (3.1 g vs 4.8 g).
- Chair de tomates has 48% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Chair de tomates
Pulpe de tomates bio 99 %, sel marin. Peut contenir des traces de lactose, céleri et moutarde.
Pulpe de tomate
Pulpe de tomate*, purée de tomate*, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique. INGREDIËNTEN: tomatenpulp*, tomatenpuree*, zuurteregelaar: citroenzuur. *Producten afkomstig uit de biologische landbouw.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomates or Pulpe de tomate?
Overall, Pulpe de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pulpe de tomate has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pulpe de tomate has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.