Chair de tomate vs Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic
Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Chair de tomate
Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomate | Chair de tomates cuisinée ba... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chair de tomate has 49% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Chair de tomate has 69% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Chair de tomate has 38% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4.2 g).
- Chair de tomate has 39% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Chair de tomate is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chair de tomate lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Chair de tomate
Pulpe de tomates* (Origine France) 99,4%, sel marin non raffine. *Issu de l'Agriculture Biologique. Peut contenir des traces de lait, moutarde et céleri
Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic
Pulpe de tomates 83 %, purée de tomates triple concentrée 8 %, oignon 4 %, huile de tournesol, sel, amidon modifié de maïs, sucre, plantes aromatiques (dont basilic déshydraté 0,16 %), poivre, arôme naturel de basilic, acidifiant: acide citrique. Traces de gluten, lait, céleri et moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomate or Chair de tomates cuisinée basilic?
Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chair de tomate has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chair de tomate has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.