Cevapcici vs Köttbular
Overall, Köttbular has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cevapcici | Köttbular |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 206 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Köttbular has 14% fewer calories (206 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Köttbular has 37% less fat (12 g vs 19 g).
- Köttbular has 81% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 9.3 g).
- Köttbular has 31% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Köttbular has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Köttbular has the better Nutri-Score.
- Köttbular is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Köttbular lists: Eggs, Gluten.
Ingredients
Cevapcici
97 % naudan jauhelihaa, mausteet, suola, rypälesokeri, glukoosisiirappi, maustamisvalmiste [hydrolysoitu kasviproteiini (rapsi, maissi), suola], paprikauute.
Köttbular
Hähnchenfleisch z.T. fein zerkleinert (75%), Zwiebeln, _Eier_, Paniermehl (_Weizenmehl_, Salz), Kartoffelmehl, Speisesalz, Wasser, Gewürze.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cevapcici or Köttbular?
Overall, Köttbular has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Köttbular has fewer calories: 206 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Köttbular has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.