Comparison
Cebula mielona vs Sprøstekt Løk
Overall, Cebula mielona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cebula mielona | Sprøstekt Løk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 619 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 47 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 6 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cebula mielona has 94% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 619 kcal).
- Cebula mielona has 99% less fat (0.6 g vs 47 g).
- Cebula mielona has 93% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.8 g).
- Sprøstekt Løk has 32% less sugar (3.2 g vs 4.8 g).
- Cebula mielona has 98% less salt (0.1 g vs 6 g).
- Sprøstekt Løk has 82% more protein (6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Cebula mielona is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sprøstekt Løk lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cebula mielona
cebula mielona
Sprøstekt Løk
Løk, vegetabilsk olje, hvetemel, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cebula mielona or Sprøstekt Løk?
Overall, Cebula mielona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cebula mielona has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 619 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sprøstekt Løk has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.