Ceaser Dressing vs Caesar
Overall, Ceaser Dressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ceaser Dressing | Caesar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 358 kcal | 564 kcal |
| Fat | 35.4 g | 60 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 5.9 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ceaser Dressing has 37% fewer calories (358 kcal vs 564 kcal).
- Ceaser Dressing has 41% less fat (35.4 g vs 60 g).
- Ceaser Dressing has 41% less saturated fat (3 g vs 5.1 g).
- Caesar has 42% less sugar (3.4 g vs 5.9 g).
- Caesar has 19% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Ceaser Dressing has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ceaser Dressing
Ingredienti: acqua, olio di colza, yogurt parzialmente scremato e pastorizzato, aceto di alcool, zuccher cipolle, sale, formaggio stagionate grattugiato (con lisozima da uovo amido modificato di mais, protein del latte, succo di limone da concente di succo di limone, spezie (con sedan addensante (gomma di xanthan) Senza glutine
Caesar
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ceaser Dressing or Caesar?
Overall, Ceaser Dressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ceaser Dressing has fewer calories: 358 kcal versus 564 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caesar has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.