Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc vs Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit
Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassoulet de Castelnaudary a... | Cassoulet de Castelnaudary a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 121 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 9.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 24% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 160 kcal).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 43% less fat (5.5 g vs 9.7 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 40% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has 36% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has 13% more protein (10 g vs 8.7 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc
Not available.
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc or Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit?
Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.