Comparison

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc vs Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit

Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCassoulet de Castelnaudary a...Cassoulet de Castelnaudary a...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — —
Calories 121 kcal 160 kcal
Fat 5.5 g 9.7 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 3.5 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.6 g
Salt 1 g 0.6 g
Fiber — 4.3 g
Protein 8.7 g 10 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 24% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 160 kcal).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 43% less fat (5.5 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 40% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has 36% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has 13% more protein (10 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc

Not available.

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc or Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit?

Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au confit has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons