Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard vs Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc
Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassoulet de Castelnaudary a... | Cassoulet de Castelnaudary a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 153 kcal | 121 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | — |
| Protein | 12 g | 8.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 21% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 153 kcal).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 31% less fat (5.5 g vs 8 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has 22% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard has 28% more protein (12 g vs 8.7 g).
- Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard
Not available.
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard or Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc?
Overall, Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au porc has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassoulet de Castelnaudary au canard has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.