Comparison

Cassave Kroepoek vs Hula hoops barbecue

Overall, Cassave Kroepoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCassave KroepoekHula hoops barbecue
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 496 kcal 493 kcal
Fat 24 g 24 g
Saturated fat 2 g 2.4 g
Sugars 8.9 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.8 g 3.1 g
Fiber 3.3 g —
Protein 1.3 g 3.7 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cassave Kroepoek has 17% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Hula hoops barbecue has 94% less sugar (0.5 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Cassave Kroepoek has 42% less salt (1.8 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Hula hoops barbecue has 65% more protein (3.7 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Cassave Kroepoek has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Hula hoops barbecue lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Cassave Kroepoek

Okbloem tonnebloemolie, tapiocazetmeel, ilipepers, lakes, nl chips van m 43,8% maniokt rietsuiker, prei, z fr chips a the manioc farine 43,8% cassava flour, sunflower hule, tapioca starch, cane sugar, leeksx, salt, chillies,

Hula hoops barbecue

potato (potato starch & dried potato), sunflower oil (24%), barbecue seasoning [WHEAT flour, salt, flavour enhancers (monosodium, glutamate, Disodium 5'-ribonucleotides), flavourings (MILK), dried onion, potassium chloride, caramel syrup powder, acidity regulator (sodium, diacetate), dried tomato, colour (paprika extract)], rice flour, maize flour, salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cassave Kroepoek or Hula hoops barbecue?

Overall, Cassave Kroepoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hula hoops barbecue has fewer calories: 493 kcal versus 496 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hula hoops barbecue has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 8.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons