Cassave Kroepoek vs Chips
Overall, Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassave Kroepoek | Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 496 kcal | 476 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 8.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 4.2 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips has 15% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Chips has 87% less sugar (1.2 g vs 8.9 g).
- Cassave Kroepoek has 38% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.9 g).
- Chips has 21% more fiber (4.2 g vs 3.3 g).
- Chips has 63% more protein (3.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Only Chips lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Cassave Kroepoek
Okbloem tonnebloemolie, tapiocazetmeel, ilipepers, lakes, nl chips van m 43,8% maniokt rietsuiker, prei, z fr chips a the manioc farine 43,8% cassava flour, sunflower hule, tapioca starch, cane sugar, leeksx, salt, chillies,
Chips
Poudre de pommes de terre, amidon de pommes de terre, huile de tournesol, goût fromage et paprika [arôme (contient fromage, poudre đoignon, poudre ďail et de paprika), lactosérum en poudre (de lait), exhausteur de goût (glutamate monosodique), acidiflant (acide citrique)), sel, Conserver au sec,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassave Kroepoek or Chips?
Overall, Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips has fewer calories: 476 kcal versus 496 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 8.9 g per 100 g.