Cașcaval vs Light
Overall, Light has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cașcaval | Light |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 310 kcal | 260 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 14.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Light has 16% fewer calories (260 kcal vs 310 kcal).
- Light has 30% less fat (16 g vs 23 g).
- Light has 31% less saturated fat (11 g vs 16 g).
- Cașcaval has 88% less salt (1.7 g vs 14.8 g).
- Light has 20% more protein (30 g vs 24 g).
- Cașcaval has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cașcaval
пастьоризирано краве мляко, трапезна сол, стабилизатор: калциев хлорид, млечнокисели култури, сирищни ензими с микробиален произход
Light
Leche pasteurizada de vaca, sal, fermentos lácticos (leche) y cuajo microbiano. Envasado en atmósfera protectora.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cașcaval or Light?
Overall, Light has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Light has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 310 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Light has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.