Cașcaval vs Jelbi light
Overall, Jelbi light has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cașcaval | Jelbi light |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 310 kcal | 143 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jelbi light has 54% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 310 kcal).
- Jelbi light has 61% less fat (9 g vs 23 g).
- Jelbi light has 63% less saturated fat (6 g vs 16 g).
- Jelbi light has 47% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Cașcaval has 58% more protein (24 g vs 10 g).
- Jelbi light has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cașcaval
пастьоризирано краве мляко, трапезна сол, стабилизатор: калциев хлорид, млечнокисели култури, сирищни ензими с микробиален произход
Jelbi light
جبن أبيض, حليب, قشدة الحليب, بروتينات الحليب, مخثرات, نشا, ألياف, كاراجينان, الكرويا, ملح, معدل الحموضة, نكهة
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cașcaval or Jelbi light?
Overall, Jelbi light has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jelbi light has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 310 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jelbi light has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.