Cașcaval vs President emmental rape fondant 350g
Overall, Cașcaval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cașcaval | President emmental rape fond... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 310 kcal | 373 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cașcaval has 17% fewer calories (310 kcal vs 373 kcal).
- Cașcaval has 21% less fat (23 g vs 29 g).
- Cașcaval has 24% less saturated fat (16 g vs 21 g).
- President emmental rape fondant 350g has 51% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- President emmental rape fondant 350g has 11% more protein (27 g vs 24 g).
Ingredients
Cașcaval
пастьоризирано краве мляко, трапезна сол, стабилизатор: калциев хлорид, млечнокисели култури, сирищни ензими с микробиален произход
President emmental rape fondant 350g
lait de vache pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactiques, fécule de pomme de terre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cașcaval or President emmental rape fondant 350g?
Overall, Cașcaval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cașcaval has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
President emmental rape fondant 350g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.