Comparison

Caramilk vs Chocolat au lait caramel & sel de Guérande

Overall, Caramilk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCaramilkChocolat au lait caramel & s...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 480 kcal 589 kcal
Fat 26 g 41 g
Saturated fat 16 g 25 g
Sugars 52 g 46 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.2 g
Fiber 2 g —
Protein 6 g 5.5 g
Additives40
AllergensMilk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caramilk has 19% fewer calories (480 kcal vs 589 kcal).
  • Caramilk has 37% less fat (26 g vs 41 g).
  • Caramilk has 36% less saturated fat (16 g vs 25 g).
  • Chocolat au lait caramel & sel de Guérande has 12% less sugar (46 g vs 52 g).
  • Only Caramilk lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Caramilk

Sugars (sugar, glucose syrup), Milk ingredients, Modified palm oil, Unsweetened chocolate, Modified vegetable oil, Cocoa butter, Salt, Soy lecithin, Baking soda, Calcium chloride, Natural and artificial flavours

Chocolat au lait caramel & sel de Guérande

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caramilk or Chocolat au lait caramel & sel de Guérande?

Overall, Caramilk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caramilk has fewer calories: 480 kcal versus 589 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat au lait caramel & sel de Guérande has less sugar: 46 g versus 52 g per 100 g.

More comparisons