Comparison

Caramilk vs 150G Lindor Caramel

Overall, Caramilk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCaramilk150G Lindor Caramel
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 480 kcal 620 kcal
Fat 26 g 46 g
Saturated fat 16 g 34 g
Sugars 52 g 44 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.4 g
Fiber 2 g —
Protein 6 g 5.1 g
Additives42
AllergensMilk, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caramilk has 23% fewer calories (480 kcal vs 620 kcal).
  • Caramilk has 43% less fat (26 g vs 46 g).
  • Caramilk has 53% less saturated fat (16 g vs 34 g).
  • 150G Lindor Caramel has 15% less sugar (44 g vs 52 g).
  • Caramilk has 15% more protein (6 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Only 150G Lindor Caramel lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Caramilk

Sugars (sugar, glucose syrup), Milk ingredients, Modified palm oil, Unsweetened chocolate, Modified vegetable oil, Cocoa butter, Salt, Soy lecithin, Baking soda, Calcium chloride, Natural and artificial flavours

150G Lindor Caramel

Sucre, matière grasse végétale de coprah, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, pâte de cacao, lactose, caramel 1,9% (sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de crème, sel, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja)), poudre de lait écrémé, beurre laitier concentré, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), extrait de malt d'orge, fleur de sel 0,17%, arômes, arôme naturel. Peut contenir du blé, des amandes, des noisettes et d'autres fruits à coque. Retrouvez aussi les tablettes et

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caramilk or 150G Lindor Caramel?

Overall, Caramilk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caramilk has fewer calories: 480 kcal versus 620 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

150G Lindor Caramel has less sugar: 44 g versus 52 g per 100 g.

More comparisons