Comparison

Caramel Flavour Protein Pudding vs PROfeel proteiinivanukas proteinpudding suklaa choklad

Overall, Caramel Flavour Protein Pudding has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCaramel Flavour Protein Pudd...PROfeel proteiinivanukas pro...
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group — —
Calories 78 kcal 85 kcal
Fat 1.6 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 1 g
Sugars 4.1 g 4.6 g
Salt — 0.2 g
Fiber 4.1 g —
Protein 10.3 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caramel Flavour Protein Pudding has 11% less sugar (4.1 g vs 4.6 g).

Ingredients

Caramel Flavour Protein Pudding

Not available.

PROfeel proteiinivanukas proteinpudding suklaa choklad

PASTORISERAD PROTEINPUDDING MED SMAK AV CHOKLAD, LAKTOS FRI, INNEHÅLLER SOTNINGSMEDEL Ingredienser: mjölk, mjölkprotein, fettreducerad kakao** 2,4 %, choklad** 0,3%, modifierad stärkelse, förtjocknings - medel (karragenan), sötningsmedel (acesulfam K, sukralos), aromer, salt, laktasenzym. *Rainforest Alliance-certifierad kakao. Få reda på mer på ra.org. ** Innehåller naturligt förekommande socker. Bäst före: se locket. Förvaras vid 0-+8 °C. Förpackningen innehåller en portion (180 g). 180 g VALIO eila LACTOSE FREE HYVÄÄ SUOMESTA 2 GOTT FRAN FINLAND PAREMP VALINTA BATTRE VAL PR PROTE VAN SUKLA

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caramel Flavour Protein Pudding or PROfeel proteiinivanukas proteinpudding suklaa choklad?

Overall, Caramel Flavour Protein Pudding has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caramel Flavour Protein Pudding has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caramel Flavour Protein Pudding has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons